Bosch Greentherm (T9900 SE 160) vs Rheem ECOHS160IP

The Rheem ECOHS160IP is the more efficient unit: UEF 0.96 versus 0.95 — about 1% less energy for the same hot water. At national average rates that works out to about $258/year for the Bosch Greentherm (T9900 SE 160) against $519/year for the Rheem ECOHS160IP — a $261 annual difference.

Bosch Greentherm (T9900 SE 160) Rheem ECOHS160IP
Uniform Energy Factor (UEF) 0.95 0.96
Fuel Natural Gas, Propane Propane
Max flow rate 4.6 GPM 4.6 GPM
Draw pattern High High
Annual gas use (natural gas) 178 therms/yr 176 therms/yr
Gas input rate 160 kBTU/h 157 kBTU/h
Max current draw 2.7 A 2 A
Vent type Direct Vent Direct Vent
Recovery efficiency 97 %
Smart / connected capable No No
Minimum activation flow 0.5 GPM 0.4 GPM
Annual propane use 194.53 gal/yr 192.35 gal/yr
Vent size 2 2
Height 32 in
Width 19 in 18.1 in
Depth 10 in 13.6 in
ENERGY STAR certified Yes Yes

Frequently asked questions

Which costs less to run, the Bosch Greentherm (T9900 SE 160) or the Rheem ECOHS160IP?

The Bosch Greentherm (T9900 SE 160): about $258/year versus $519/year for the Rheem ECOHS160IP at national average rates — a $261 annual difference.

Are the Bosch Greentherm (T9900 SE 160) and Rheem ECOHS160IP both ENERGY STAR certified?

Yes — every water heater in this database is drawn from the U.S. EPA ENERGY STAR certified water heater datasets.