Bradford White RTGR150N1 vs Rinnai CX160I REU-NB2530FFC-US

The Bradford White RTGR150N1 is the more efficient unit: UEF 0.98 versus 0.97 — about 1% less energy for the same hot water. At national average rates that works out to about $251/year for the Bradford White RTGR150N1 against $254/year for the Rinnai CX160I REU-NB2530FFC-US — a $3 annual difference. The Rinnai CX160I REU-NB2530FFC-US sustains the higher flow (4.6 GPM vs 4.3 GPM under the DOE test).

Bradford White RTGR150N1 Rinnai CX160I REU-NB2530FFC-US
Uniform Energy Factor (UEF) 0.98 0.97
Fuel Natural Gas Natural Gas, Propane
Max flow rate 4.3 GPM 4.6 GPM
Draw pattern High High
Annual gas use (natural gas) 173 therms/yr 175 therms/yr
Gas input rate 150 kBTU/h 160 kBTU/h
Max current draw 2 A 4 A
Vent type Power Direct Vent Power Direct Vent
Recovery efficiency 98 % 98 %
Smart / connected capable No No
Minimum activation flow 0.5 GPM 0.1 GPM
Annual propane use 189.07 gal/yr 191.25 gal/yr
Vent size 2 / 3 2
Height 25.8 in
Diameter 11.4 in
Width 17.3 in 18.5 in
Depth 14.8 in 11.4 in
ENERGY STAR certified Yes Yes

Frequently asked questions

Which costs less to run, the Bradford White RTGR150N1 or the Rinnai CX160I REU-NB2530FFC-US?

The Bradford White RTGR150N1: about $251/year versus $254/year for the Rinnai CX160I REU-NB2530FFC-US at national average rates — a $3 annual difference.

Are the Bradford White RTGR150N1 and Rinnai CX160I REU-NB2530FFC-US both ENERGY STAR certified?

Yes — every water heater in this database is drawn from the U.S. EPA ENERGY STAR certified water heater datasets.