Bradford White RTGR150X1 vs Rheem ECOHS160IN

The Bradford White RTGR150X1 is the more efficient unit: UEF 0.98 versus 0.96 — about 2% less energy for the same hot water. At national average rates that works out to about $255/year for the Rheem ECOHS160IN against $510/year for the Bradford White RTGR150X1 — a $255 annual difference. The Rheem ECOHS160IN sustains the higher flow (4.6 GPM vs 4.3 GPM under the DOE test).

Bradford White RTGR150X1 Rheem ECOHS160IN
Uniform Energy Factor (UEF) 0.98 0.96
Fuel Propane Natural Gas
Max flow rate 4.3 GPM 4.6 GPM
Draw pattern High High
Annual gas use (natural gas) 173 therms/yr 176 therms/yr
Gas input rate 150 kBTU/h 157 kBTU/h
Max current draw 2 A 2 A
Vent type Power Direct Vent Direct Vent
Recovery efficiency 98 % 97 %
Smart / connected capable No No
Minimum activation flow 0.5 GPM 0.4 GPM
Annual propane use 189.07 gal/yr 192.35 gal/yr
Vent size 2 / 3 2
Width 17.3 in 18.1 in
Depth 14.8 in 13.6 in
ENERGY STAR certified Yes Yes

Frequently asked questions

Which costs less to run, the Bradford White RTGR150X1 or the Rheem ECOHS160IN?

The Rheem ECOHS160IN: about $255/year versus $510/year for the Bradford White RTGR150X1 at national average rates — a $255 annual difference.

Are the Bradford White RTGR150X1 and Rheem ECOHS160IN both ENERGY STAR certified?

Yes — every water heater in this database is drawn from the U.S. EPA ENERGY STAR certified water heater datasets.