Bradford White RTGR150X1 vs Rheem ECOHS160IP

The Bradford White RTGR150X1 is the more efficient unit: UEF 0.98 versus 0.96 — about 2% less energy for the same hot water. At national average rates that works out to about $510/year for the Bradford White RTGR150X1 against $519/year for the Rheem ECOHS160IP — a $9 annual difference. The Rheem ECOHS160IP sustains the higher flow (4.6 GPM vs 4.3 GPM under the DOE test).

Bradford White RTGR150X1 Rheem ECOHS160IP
Uniform Energy Factor (UEF) 0.98 0.96
Fuel Propane Propane
Max flow rate 4.3 GPM 4.6 GPM
Draw pattern High High
Annual gas use (natural gas) 173 therms/yr 176 therms/yr
Gas input rate 150 kBTU/h 157 kBTU/h
Max current draw 2 A 2 A
Vent type Power Direct Vent Direct Vent
Recovery efficiency 98 % 97 %
Smart / connected capable No No
Minimum activation flow 0.5 GPM 0.4 GPM
Annual propane use 189.07 gal/yr 192.35 gal/yr
Vent size 2 / 3 2
Width 17.3 in 18.1 in
Depth 14.8 in 13.6 in
ENERGY STAR certified Yes Yes

Frequently asked questions

Which costs less to run, the Bradford White RTGR150X1 or the Rheem ECOHS160IP?

The Bradford White RTGR150X1: about $510/year versus $519/year for the Rheem ECOHS160IP at national average rates — a $9 annual difference.

Are the Bradford White RTGR150X1 and Rheem ECOHS160IP both ENERGY STAR certified?

Yes — every water heater in this database is drawn from the U.S. EPA ENERGY STAR certified water heater datasets.