Bradford White RTGS150N1 vs Rheem ECOHS180IN

The Bradford White RTGS150N1 is the more efficient unit: UEF 0.98 versus 0.96 — about 2% less energy for the same hot water. At national average rates that works out to about $251/year for the Bradford White RTGS150N1 against $255/year for the Rheem ECOHS180IN — a $4 annual difference. The Rheem ECOHS180IN sustains the higher flow (5.2 GPM vs 4.3 GPM under the DOE test).

Bradford White RTGS150N1 Rheem ECOHS180IN
Uniform Energy Factor (UEF) 0.98 0.96
Fuel Natural Gas Natural Gas
Max flow rate 4.3 GPM 5.2 GPM
Draw pattern High High
Annual gas use (natural gas) 173 therms/yr 176 therms/yr
Gas input rate 150 kBTU/h 180 kBTU/h
Max current draw 2 A 2 A
Vent type Power Direct Vent Direct Vent
Recovery efficiency 98 % 98 %
Smart / connected capable No No
Minimum activation flow 0.5 GPM 0.4 GPM
Annual propane use 189.07 gal/yr 192.35 gal/yr
Vent size 2 / 3 2
Width 17.3 in 18.1 in
Depth 14.8 in 13.6 in
ENERGY STAR certified Yes Yes

Frequently asked questions

Which costs less to run, the Bradford White RTGS150N1 or the Rheem ECOHS180IN?

The Bradford White RTGS150N1: about $251/year versus $255/year for the Rheem ECOHS180IN at national average rates — a $4 annual difference.

Are the Bradford White RTGS150N1 and Rheem ECOHS180IN both ENERGY STAR certified?

Yes — every water heater in this database is drawn from the U.S. EPA ENERGY STAR certified water heater datasets.