Bradford White RTGS150N1 vs Richmond RMTGHS11IN

The Bradford White RTGS150N1 is the more efficient unit: UEF 0.98 versus 0.96 — about 2% less energy for the same hot water. At national average rates that works out to about $251/year for the Bradford White RTGS150N1 against $255/year for the Richmond RMTGHS11IN — a $4 annual difference. The Richmond RMTGHS11IN sustains the higher flow (5.8 GPM vs 4.3 GPM under the DOE test).

Bradford White RTGS150N1 Richmond RMTGHS11IN
Uniform Energy Factor (UEF) 0.98 0.96
Fuel Natural Gas Natural Gas
Max flow rate 4.3 GPM 5.8 GPM
Draw pattern High High
Annual gas use (natural gas) 173 therms/yr 176 therms/yr
Gas input rate 150 kBTU/h 199 kBTU/h
Max current draw 2 A 2 A
Vent type Power Direct Vent Direct Vent
Recovery efficiency 98 % 98 %
Smart / connected capable No No
Minimum activation flow 0.5 GPM 0.4 GPM
Annual propane use 189.07 gal/yr 192.35 gal/yr
Vent size 2 / 3 2
Width 17.3 in 18.1 in
Depth 14.8 in 13.6 in
ENERGY STAR certified Yes Yes

Frequently asked questions

Which costs less to run, the Bradford White RTGS150N1 or the Richmond RMTGHS11IN?

The Bradford White RTGS150N1: about $251/year versus $255/year for the Richmond RMTGHS11IN at national average rates — a $4 annual difference.

Are the Bradford White RTGS150N1 and Richmond RMTGHS11IN both ENERGY STAR certified?

Yes — every water heater in this database is drawn from the U.S. EPA ENERGY STAR certified water heater datasets.