Friedrich FDTGH-S84I vs Lochinvar ATHR-160M 1 (LTHR-160M 1)

The Friedrich FDTGH-S84I is the more efficient unit: UEF 0.96 versus 0.95 — about 1% less energy for the same hot water. At national average rates that works out to about $255/year for the Friedrich FDTGH-S84I against $258/year for the Lochinvar ATHR-160M 1 (LTHR-160M 1) — a $3 annual difference. The Lochinvar ATHR-160M 1 (LTHR-160M 1) sustains the higher flow (4.8 GPM vs 4.6 GPM under the DOE test).

Friedrich FDTGH-S84I Lochinvar ATHR-160M 1 (LTHR-160M 1)
Uniform Energy Factor (UEF) 0.96 0.95
Fuel Natural Gas, Propane Natural Gas, Propane
Max flow rate 4.6 GPM 4.8 GPM
Draw pattern High High
Annual gas use (natural gas) 176 therms/yr 178 therms/yr
Gas input rate 157 kBTU/h 160 kBTU/h
Max current draw 2 A 5 A
Vent type Direct Vent Power Vent, Power Direct Vent
Recovery efficiency 97 % 98 %
Smart / connected capable No No
Minimum activation flow 0.4 GPM 1 GPM
Annual propane use 192.35 gal/yr 194.53 gal/yr
Vent size 2 3 / 2
Width 18.1 in 17 in
Depth 13.6 in 16 in
ENERGY STAR certified Yes Yes

Frequently asked questions

Which costs less to run, the Friedrich FDTGH-S84I or the Lochinvar ATHR-160M 1 (LTHR-160M 1)?

The Friedrich FDTGH-S84I: about $255/year versus $258/year for the Lochinvar ATHR-160M 1 (LTHR-160M 1) at national average rates — a $3 annual difference.

Are the Friedrich FDTGH-S84I and Lochinvar ATHR-160M 1 (LTHR-160M 1) both ENERGY STAR certified?

Yes — every water heater in this database is drawn from the U.S. EPA ENERGY STAR certified water heater datasets.