Lochinvar ATHR-160M 1 (LTHR-160X3 1) vs Navien NPE-210S2

The Navien NPE-210S2 is the more efficient unit: UEF 0.96 versus 0.95 — about 1% less energy for the same hot water. At national average rates that works out to about $255/year for the Navien NPE-210S2 against $258/year for the Lochinvar ATHR-160M 1 (LTHR-160X3 1) — a $3 annual difference. The Navien NPE-210S2 sustains the higher flow (5.3 GPM vs 4.8 GPM under the DOE test).

Lochinvar ATHR-160M 1 (LTHR-160X3 1) Navien NPE-210S2
Uniform Energy Factor (UEF) 0.95 0.96
Fuel Natural Gas, Propane Natural Gas, Propane
Max flow rate 4.8 GPM 5.3 GPM
Draw pattern High High
Annual gas use (natural gas) 178 therms/yr 176 therms/yr
Gas input rate 160 kBTU/h 180 kBTU/h
Max current draw 5 A 5 A
Vent type Power Vent, Power Direct Vent Power Direct Vent
Recovery efficiency 98 %
Smart / connected capable No No
Minimum activation flow 1 GPM 1 GPM
Annual propane use 194.53 gal/yr 192.35 gal/yr
Vent size 3 / 2 2
Height 27 in
Width 17 in 17 in
Depth 16 in 13 in
ENERGY STAR certified Yes Yes

Frequently asked questions

Which costs less to run, the Lochinvar ATHR-160M 1 (LTHR-160X3 1) or the Navien NPE-210S2?

The Navien NPE-210S2: about $255/year versus $258/year for the Lochinvar ATHR-160M 1 (LTHR-160X3 1) at national average rates — a $3 annual difference.

Are the Lochinvar ATHR-160M 1 (LTHR-160X3 1) and Navien NPE-210S2 both ENERGY STAR certified?

Yes — every water heater in this database is drawn from the U.S. EPA ENERGY STAR certified water heater datasets.