Midea JSG40-24PCH-NG vs Rheem ECOHS160IN

The Rheem ECOHS160IN is the more efficient unit: UEF 0.96 versus 0.95 — about 1% less energy for the same hot water. At national average rates that works out to about $255/year for the Rheem ECOHS160IN against $257/year for the Midea JSG40-24PCH-NG — a $2 annual difference. The Rheem ECOHS160IN sustains the higher flow (4.6 GPM vs 4.4 GPM under the DOE test).

Midea JSG40-24PCH-NG Rheem ECOHS160IN
Uniform Energy Factor (UEF) 0.95 0.96
Fuel Natural Gas Natural Gas
Max flow rate 4.4 GPM 4.6 GPM
Draw pattern High High
Annual gas use (natural gas) 177 therms/yr 176 therms/yr
Gas input rate 150 kBTU/h 157 kBTU/h
Max current draw 1.1 A 2 A
Vent type Power Direct Vent Direct Vent
Recovery efficiency 0.96 % 97 %
Smart / connected capable No No
Minimum activation flow 0.5 GPM 0.4 GPM
Annual propane use 193.44 gal/yr 192.35 gal/yr
Vent size 2 / 3 2
Height 26.8 in
Width 17.3 in 18.1 in
Depth 11 in 13.6 in
ENERGY STAR certified Yes Yes

Frequently asked questions

Which costs less to run, the Midea JSG40-24PCH-NG or the Rheem ECOHS160IN?

The Rheem ECOHS160IN: about $255/year versus $257/year for the Midea JSG40-24PCH-NG at national average rates — a $2 annual difference.

Are the Midea JSG40-24PCH-NG and Rheem ECOHS160IN both ENERGY STAR certified?

Yes — every water heater in this database is drawn from the U.S. EPA ENERGY STAR certified water heater datasets.