Midea JSG40-24PCH-NG vs Rheem ECOHS160IP

The Rheem ECOHS160IP is the more efficient unit: UEF 0.96 versus 0.95 — about 1% less energy for the same hot water. At national average rates that works out to about $257/year for the Midea JSG40-24PCH-NG against $519/year for the Rheem ECOHS160IP — a $262 annual difference. The Rheem ECOHS160IP sustains the higher flow (4.6 GPM vs 4.4 GPM under the DOE test).

Midea JSG40-24PCH-NG Rheem ECOHS160IP
Uniform Energy Factor (UEF) 0.95 0.96
Fuel Natural Gas Propane
Max flow rate 4.4 GPM 4.6 GPM
Draw pattern High High
Annual gas use (natural gas) 177 therms/yr 176 therms/yr
Gas input rate 150 kBTU/h 157 kBTU/h
Max current draw 1.1 A 2 A
Vent type Power Direct Vent Direct Vent
Recovery efficiency 0.96 % 97 %
Smart / connected capable No No
Minimum activation flow 0.5 GPM 0.4 GPM
Annual propane use 193.44 gal/yr 192.35 gal/yr
Vent size 2 / 3 2
Height 26.8 in
Width 17.3 in 18.1 in
Depth 11 in 13.6 in
ENERGY STAR certified Yes Yes

Frequently asked questions

Which costs less to run, the Midea JSG40-24PCH-NG or the Rheem ECOHS160IP?

The Midea JSG40-24PCH-NG: about $257/year versus $519/year for the Rheem ECOHS160IP at national average rates — a $262 annual difference.

Are the Midea JSG40-24PCH-NG and Rheem ECOHS160IP both ENERGY STAR certified?

Yes — every water heater in this database is drawn from the U.S. EPA ENERGY STAR certified water heater datasets.