Midea JSG40-24PCH-NG vs Rinnai CX160I REU-NB2530FFC-US

The Rinnai CX160I REU-NB2530FFC-US is the more efficient unit: UEF 0.97 versus 0.95 — about 2% less energy for the same hot water. At national average rates that works out to about $254/year for the Rinnai CX160I REU-NB2530FFC-US against $257/year for the Midea JSG40-24PCH-NG — a $3 annual difference. The Rinnai CX160I REU-NB2530FFC-US sustains the higher flow (4.6 GPM vs 4.4 GPM under the DOE test).

Midea JSG40-24PCH-NG Rinnai CX160I REU-NB2530FFC-US
Uniform Energy Factor (UEF) 0.95 0.97
Fuel Natural Gas Natural Gas, Propane
Max flow rate 4.4 GPM 4.6 GPM
Draw pattern High High
Annual gas use (natural gas) 177 therms/yr 175 therms/yr
Gas input rate 150 kBTU/h 160 kBTU/h
Max current draw 1.1 A 4 A
Vent type Power Direct Vent Power Direct Vent
Recovery efficiency 0.96 % 98 %
Smart / connected capable No No
Minimum activation flow 0.5 GPM 0.1 GPM
Annual propane use 193.44 gal/yr 191.25 gal/yr
Vent size 2 / 3 2
Height 26.8 in 25.8 in
Diameter — 11.4 in
Width 17.3 in 18.5 in
Depth 11 in 11.4 in
ENERGY STAR certified Yes Yes

Frequently asked questions

Which costs less to run, the Midea JSG40-24PCH-NG or the Rinnai CX160I REU-NB2530FFC-US?

The Rinnai CX160I REU-NB2530FFC-US: about $254/year versus $257/year for the Midea JSG40-24PCH-NG at national average rates — a $3 annual difference.

Are the Midea JSG40-24PCH-NG and Rinnai CX160I REU-NB2530FFC-US both ENERGY STAR certified?

Yes — every water heater in this database is drawn from the U.S. EPA ENERGY STAR certified water heater datasets.