Midea JSG40-24PCH-NG vs Rinnai CX199I REU-NB3237FFC-US

The Rinnai CX199I REU-NB3237FFC-US is the more efficient unit: UEF 0.98 versus 0.95 — about 3% less energy for the same hot water. At national average rates that works out to about $251/year for the Rinnai CX199I REU-NB3237FFC-US against $257/year for the Midea JSG40-24PCH-NG — a $6 annual difference. The Rinnai CX199I REU-NB3237FFC-US sustains the higher flow (5.8 GPM vs 4.4 GPM under the DOE test).

Midea JSG40-24PCH-NG Rinnai CX199I REU-NB3237FFC-US
Uniform Energy Factor (UEF) 0.95 0.98
Fuel Natural Gas Natural Gas, Propane
Max flow rate 4.4 GPM 5.8 GPM
Draw pattern High High
Annual gas use (natural gas) 177 therms/yr 173 therms/yr
Gas input rate 150 kBTU/h 199 kBTU/h
Max current draw 1.1 A 4 A
Vent type Power Direct Vent Power Direct Vent
Recovery efficiency 0.96 % 99 %
Smart / connected capable No No
Minimum activation flow 0.5 GPM 0.1 GPM
Annual propane use 193.44 gal/yr 189.07 gal/yr
Vent size 2 / 3 2
Height 26.8 in 25.8 in
Diameter 11.4 in
Width 17.3 in 18.5 in
Depth 11 in 11.4 in
ENERGY STAR certified Yes Yes

Frequently asked questions

Which costs less to run, the Midea JSG40-24PCH-NG or the Rinnai CX199I REU-NB3237FFC-US?

The Rinnai CX199I REU-NB3237FFC-US: about $251/year versus $257/year for the Midea JSG40-24PCH-NG at national average rates — a $6 annual difference.

Are the Midea JSG40-24PCH-NG and Rinnai CX199I REU-NB3237FFC-US both ENERGY STAR certified?

Yes — every water heater in this database is drawn from the U.S. EPA ENERGY STAR certified water heater datasets.