Rheem ECOHS160IN vs State ATHR-160M 1 (STHR-160M 1)

The Rheem ECOHS160IN is the more efficient unit: UEF 0.96 versus 0.95 — about 1% less energy for the same hot water. At national average rates that works out to about $255/year for the Rheem ECOHS160IN against $258/year for the State ATHR-160M 1 (STHR-160M 1) — a $3 annual difference. The State ATHR-160M 1 (STHR-160M 1) sustains the higher flow (4.8 GPM vs 4.6 GPM under the DOE test).

Rheem ECOHS160IN State ATHR-160M 1 (STHR-160M 1)
Uniform Energy Factor (UEF) 0.96 0.95
Fuel Natural Gas Natural Gas, Propane
Max flow rate 4.6 GPM 4.8 GPM
Draw pattern High High
Annual gas use (natural gas) 176 therms/yr 178 therms/yr
Gas input rate 157 kBTU/h 160 kBTU/h
Max current draw 2 A 5 A
Vent type Direct Vent Power Vent, Power Direct Vent
Recovery efficiency 97 % 98 %
Smart / connected capable No No
Minimum activation flow 0.4 GPM 1 GPM
Annual propane use 192.35 gal/yr 194.53 gal/yr
Vent size 2 3 / 2
Width 18.1 in 17 in
Depth 13.6 in 16 in
ENERGY STAR certified Yes Yes

Frequently asked questions

Which costs less to run, the Rheem ECOHS160IN or the State ATHR-160M 1 (STHR-160M 1)?

The Rheem ECOHS160IN: about $255/year versus $258/year for the State ATHR-160M 1 (STHR-160M 1) at national average rates — a $3 annual difference.

Are the Rheem ECOHS160IN and State ATHR-160M 1 (STHR-160M 1) both ENERGY STAR certified?

Yes — every water heater in this database is drawn from the U.S. EPA ENERGY STAR certified water heater datasets.