Rheem ECOHS160IP vs Rinnai CX160I REU-NB2530FFC-US

The Rinnai CX160I REU-NB2530FFC-US is the more efficient unit: UEF 0.97 versus 0.96 — about 1% less energy for the same hot water. At national average rates that works out to about $254/year for the Rinnai CX160I REU-NB2530FFC-US against $519/year for the Rheem ECOHS160IP — a $265 annual difference.

Rheem ECOHS160IP Rinnai CX160I REU-NB2530FFC-US
Uniform Energy Factor (UEF) 0.96 0.97
Fuel Propane Natural Gas, Propane
Max flow rate 4.6 GPM 4.6 GPM
Draw pattern High High
Annual gas use (natural gas) 176 therms/yr 175 therms/yr
Gas input rate 157 kBTU/h 160 kBTU/h
Max current draw 2 A 4 A
Vent type Direct Vent Power Direct Vent
Recovery efficiency 97 % 98 %
Smart / connected capable No No
Minimum activation flow 0.4 GPM 0.1 GPM
Annual propane use 192.35 gal/yr 191.25 gal/yr
Vent size 2 2
Height 25.8 in
Diameter 11.4 in
Width 18.1 in 18.5 in
Depth 13.6 in 11.4 in
ENERGY STAR certified Yes Yes

Frequently asked questions

Which costs less to run, the Rheem ECOHS160IP or the Rinnai CX160I REU-NB2530FFC-US?

The Rinnai CX160I REU-NB2530FFC-US: about $254/year versus $519/year for the Rheem ECOHS160IP at national average rates — a $265 annual difference.

Are the Rheem ECOHS160IP and Rinnai CX160I REU-NB2530FFC-US both ENERGY STAR certified?

Yes — every water heater in this database is drawn from the U.S. EPA ENERGY STAR certified water heater datasets.