Rheem ECOHS160IP vs Rinnai CXP199I REU-NBP3237FFC-US

The Rinnai CXP199I REU-NBP3237FFC-US is the more efficient unit: UEF 0.98 versus 0.96 — about 2% less energy for the same hot water. At national average rates that works out to about $251/year for the Rinnai CXP199I REU-NBP3237FFC-US against $519/year for the Rheem ECOHS160IP — a $268 annual difference. The Rinnai CXP199I REU-NBP3237FFC-US sustains the higher flow (5.8 GPM vs 4.6 GPM under the DOE test).

Rheem ECOHS160IP Rinnai CXP199I REU-NBP3237FFC-US
Uniform Energy Factor (UEF) 0.96 0.98
Fuel Propane Natural Gas, Propane
Max flow rate 4.6 GPM 5.8 GPM
Draw pattern High High
Annual gas use (natural gas) 176 therms/yr 173 therms/yr
Gas input rate 157 kBTU/h 199 kBTU/h
Max current draw 2 A 4 A
Vent type Direct Vent Power Direct Vent
Recovery efficiency 97 % 99 %
Smart / connected capable No No
Minimum activation flow 0.4 GPM 0.1 GPM
Annual propane use 192.35 gal/yr 189.07 gal/yr
Vent size 2 2
Height 25.8 in
Diameter 11.4 in
Width 18.1 in 18.5 in
Depth 13.6 in 11.4 in
ENERGY STAR certified Yes Yes

Frequently asked questions

Which costs less to run, the Rheem ECOHS160IP or the Rinnai CXP199I REU-NBP3237FFC-US?

The Rinnai CXP199I REU-NBP3237FFC-US: about $251/year versus $519/year for the Rheem ECOHS160IP at national average rates — a $268 annual difference.

Are the Rheem ECOHS160IP and Rinnai CXP199I REU-NBP3237FFC-US both ENERGY STAR certified?

Yes — every water heater in this database is drawn from the U.S. EPA ENERGY STAR certified water heater datasets.