Rheem ECOHS160IP vs State ATHR-180M 1 (STHR-180M 1)

The Rheem ECOHS160IP is the more efficient unit: UEF 0.96 versus 0.95 — about 1% less energy for the same hot water. At national average rates that works out to about $258/year for the State ATHR-180M 1 (STHR-180M 1) against $519/year for the Rheem ECOHS160IP — a $261 annual difference. The State ATHR-180M 1 (STHR-180M 1) sustains the higher flow (5.3 GPM vs 4.6 GPM under the DOE test).

Rheem ECOHS160IP State ATHR-180M 1 (STHR-180M 1)
Uniform Energy Factor (UEF) 0.96 0.95
Fuel Propane Natural Gas, Propane
Max flow rate 4.6 GPM 5.3 GPM
Draw pattern High High
Annual gas use (natural gas) 176 therms/yr 178 therms/yr
Gas input rate 157 kBTU/h 180 kBTU/h
Max current draw 2 A 5 A
Vent type Direct Vent Power Vent, Power Direct Vent
Recovery efficiency 97 % 97 %
Smart / connected capable No No
Minimum activation flow 0.4 GPM 1 GPM
Annual propane use 192.35 gal/yr 194.53 gal/yr
Vent size 2 3 / 2
Width 18.1 in 17 in
Depth 13.6 in 16 in
ENERGY STAR certified Yes Yes

Frequently asked questions

Which costs less to run, the Rheem ECOHS160IP or the State ATHR-180M 1 (STHR-180M 1)?

The State ATHR-180M 1 (STHR-180M 1): about $258/year versus $519/year for the Rheem ECOHS160IP at national average rates — a $261 annual difference.

Are the Rheem ECOHS160IP and State ATHR-180M 1 (STHR-180M 1) both ENERGY STAR certified?

Yes — every water heater in this database is drawn from the U.S. EPA ENERGY STAR certified water heater datasets.